Comparison with Alternatives
⚡ 7 min readSee how Transcodes compares to traditional WebAuthn/Passkey providers.
Integration Complexity
Traditional Authentication Implementation
With existing solutions, every authentication requires multiple round-trips between your code and external services:
🔴 Red = Code you must write and maintain
You are responsible for:
- Backend SDK installation and configuration
- API endpoints for challenge generation and verification
- Database schema design and credential storage
- Frontend UI implementation
- Session management and token handling
- Error handling and edge cases
Transcodes Integration
With Transcodes, everything is handled automatically:
🔴 Red = Your code | 🟢 Green = Transcodes handles
You are responsible for:
- Adding one script tag
- Calling one function
Transcodes handles:
- WebAuthn Intergration in your browser with one script tag
- Automatic session management and token management
- Pre-built UI and error handling
- No refresh token needed
- Every access token is in-memory stored with AES-256-GCM encryption
Feature Comparison
| Criteria | Auth0 | Stytch | Passage | Transcodes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 1-2 days | Half day | Half day | 5 minutes |
| Backend Required | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Learning Curve | High | Medium | Medium | Almost none |
| Free Tier | 25K MAU | 10K MAU | 1K MAU | 5K MAU |
| Cost | ~$700/mo | ~$100/mo | ~$450/mo | $19+/month |
| Pre-built UI | Universal Login | Hosted UI | Custom elements | Built-in modals |
| Token Management | Semi-Auto | Semi-Auto | Semi-Auto | Automatic |
Code Comparison
Traditional Providers (100+ lines)
// Backend: challenge endpoints, verification, database storage
app.post('/api/webauthn/register/options', async (req, res) => {
/* ... */
});
app.post('/api/webauthn/register/verify', async (req, res) => {
/* ... */
});
app.post('/api/webauthn/login/options', async (req, res) => {
/* ... */
});
app.post('/api/webauthn/login/verify', async (req, res) => {
/* ... */
});
// Frontend: API calls, WebAuthn ceremony handling, error states
const options = await fetch('/api/webauthn/register/options');
const credential = await navigator.credentials.create(options);
await fetch('/api/webauthn/register/verify', { body: credential });
// ... plus authentication flow, token management, etc.Transcodes (3 lines)
const result = await transcodes.openAuthLoginModal();
if (result.success) {
console.log('Authenticated!', result.payload[0].user);
}💡
The Key Difference: Other solutions require backend SDKs and API endpoints. With Transcodes, you add one script tag and you’re done.
Why No Backend?
Transcodes uses a browser-native architecture that keeps authentication entirely client-side:
- Private keys are generated and stored in the browser’s IndexedDB
- Token generation happens by signing challenges with the private key
- Signature verification is handled by Transcodes’ backend
- Your backend only needs to validate the JWT token
This means:
- No SDK to install on your server
- No database tables to create
- No API endpoints to implement
- No session management code
Your backend simply validates the JWT token like any other OAuth flow.
Security Advantage
| Traditional Auth | Transcodes |
|---|---|
| Stores secrets on your server | No secrets to store |
| You’re responsible for key management | Browser handles key security |
| Server breach = credential leak | Nothing to leak |
| Complex refresh token rotation | Private key = permanent credential |
Next Steps
- Architecture - Deep dive into how Transcodes works
- Quick Start - Get started in 5 minutes
Last updated on